Among the insistent rise of consumer costs, the previous leader of the United States of America, Mr. Donald Trump, has issued an executive order that will support federal institutions to adopt strategies designed to bring down the living costs, thus making housing and other life-sustaining amenities more feasible for Americans. Through that order, as part of an actual plan to control inflation to ensure that people can afford common needs in their lives, citizens would find the government taking the appropriate action.

The rule aims, first and foremost, on issues that have to do with strict regulations, this is a case of very limited land zoning rules, very complex building codes, and the requirement for extra amounts of energy consumption. They have always been the cause of accommodation that has been difficult and rentals that have been high. In this way, the objective will be achieved by partnering with the state, local, and private sectors.

Federal Property Sales and Economic Impact

One of the measures that the administration is putting into practice is the selling of 443 government-owned properties in 47 states of the country, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico. This is part of the government’s plan to take away from taxpayers a sum of $430 million annually, which is being spent on an erroneous maintenance program while maintaining the commercial. Widespread property sales activities across nearly 80 million square feet of commercial space are foreseen to save taxpayers about $430 million annually by streamlining maintenance and efficiency of the management of government-owned real estate properties.

In addition, drawbacks can be seen when programs with other objectives are carried out. A proffered “gold card” visa program, which IMHO grants immigrants an opportunity to become citizens if they invest not less than $5 million in the U.S., may affect the social equilibrium using the growing demand for more luxury buildings, which might result in higher prices. Furthermore, there are concerns that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) could be facing conflicts of interest. According to reports, people associated with private real estate and mobile home businesses that are connected to the HUD systems that control the exposed personal data and housing voucher expenditures have data security and the big influence of the outsiders on federal housing policy, which is the reason.

One more method is to extract domestic fuel resources to reduce the cost of transportation as a result of the national energy emergency executive order. The executive order in question is the one that the government initiated to increase domestic oil and gas supply, in order to reduce transportation and utility bills for consumers.

These actions mirror the big strategy to cut down the cost of living; however, their success will be up to the cooperation and performance of not only federal but also state and private entities. Economists and policymakers will hence keep their eyes on the housing affordability and the overall inflation rate as these policies roll out.